Wednesday, March 5, 2008

The Death Watch

A news organization has an internal memo "anonymously" sent to them from the Kern Co. Sheriff's Department detailing a warning to employees about the possibility of a gang "hit" against one of them.

It spells out in detail who might be involved, where it might happen and other intimate intelligence.

So, is that news?!

The sensational, tabloid journalist would scream "YES" and immediately begin organizing the coverage.

A map of the area where it might happen, we have to let the public know where the killing might take place.

Maybe use an "X" to mark the spot of previous shootings over the past five or 10 years to show potential killing grounds.

Interviews, yes interviews. We need deputies telling a camera how they "feel" about being a potential target for gang members who are irate with officers for killing one of their own.

And plenty of video, what we call B-Roll, showing deputies putting on their bullet-proof vests. Maybe slow motion, yes it's more dramatic.

Don't forget a copy of the memo.

Yes, a department internal memo, like some secret war document, that contains the information the Sheriff Department likes to keep somewhat confidential so as not to create a panic.

Panic among deputies and the public.

What a joke.

I have no problem with telling the public that threats have been made against a law enforcement official, it happens all the time.

I'm not sure of the percentage, but the probability that someone actually carries out that threat is very slim.

I agree with Sheriff Donny Youngblood who said to print or report the details of the alleged attack is irresponsible.

I find it mildly pathetic.

What news value does it hold?

Oh, right, you're informing the public.

They have a right to know.

And, if it never comes to pass, at least you scared the viewer or reader to stay tuned for a couple more days.

No comments: